Oh hey, this is a blog about urjnasw xkfjjkn, the alien from a planet by the same name. Stay tuned for news!
Monday, February 18, 2013
Yahoo! answer
Hi!
Here's the solution:
The equation can be written as:
(x - 2)^2 + (y - 1)^2 = (5)^2
A circle's equation is
(x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = (r)^2, where (a, b) is the center and r is the radius
So, center is (2, 1) and radius is 5. => D
Hope it helps.
Good luck!!!
- urjnasw xkfjjkn
Yahoo! answer- urjnasw xkfjjkn
Hi!
Here's the solution:
When a line intercepts x- axis, its y value is 0.
So, -4x + 5(0) = 16
=> -4x = 16
=> x = -4
=> X- intercept is (-4, 0)
Hope it helps.
Good luck!!!
- urjnasw xkfjjkn
Yahoo! answer- Urjnasw Xkfjjkn
Hi!
Here's the solution:
Since the target line is perpendicular, its slope is -1/m, where m is the slope of the given line.
Slope- Intercept form is y = m*x + c, where m = slope and c = intercept
From the given equation, m = 1/8
So the slope of a line perpendicular to it = -1 / (1/8) = -8
So the target line is y = -8 * x + c' where c' = intercept.
This line passes through (2, -3).
So, -3 = -8 * 2 + c'
=> c' = 13
=> Equation of perpendicular line is y = -8*x + 13
Hope it helps.
Good Luck!!!
- urjnasw xkfjjkn
Yahoo! Answer- urjnasw xkfjjkn
Hi! Here's the solution:
Let's say the numbers are a and b.
a > b
Given that a + b = 101 / 10.
Suppose b = (9/10) * a
=>a + (9/10) * a = 101 / 10
=>(19* a)/ 10 = 101 / 10
=> 19* a = 101
=> a = 5.315789473684211
=> b = (9 / 10) * 5.315789473684211 = 4.784210526315789
Hope it helps.
Good luck!
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Yahoo! Answer by urjnasw xkfjjkn
Hi! Here's the solution:
Let's say the numbers are a and b.
a > b
Given that a - b = 56 / 15.
Suppose b = (11/15) * a
=>a - (11/15) * a = 56 / 15
=>(4 * a)/ 15 = 56 / 15
=> 4 * a = 56
=> a = 14
=> b = (11 / 15) * 14 = 10.26667
Hope it helps.
Good luck!
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Yahoo! Quesiton Answer
Hi!
Here's the solution:
f'(x) = -sin(sqrt(5x + 2)) * (d(sqrt(5x + 2)) / dx) (Chain Rule)
= -sin(sqrt(5x + 2)) * (1/[2*sqrt(5x + 2)]) * d(5x + 2) / dx
= -sin(sqrt(5x + 2)) * (1/[2*sqrt(5x + 2)]) * 5
Hope it helps.
Good luck!
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Here's the solution:
f'(x) = -sin(sqrt(5x + 2)) * (d(sqrt(5x + 2)) / dx) (Chain Rule)
= -sin(sqrt(5x + 2)) * (1/[2*sqrt(5x + 2)]) * d(5x + 2) / dx
= -sin(sqrt(5x + 2)) * (1/[2*sqrt(5x + 2)]) * 5
Hope it helps.
Good luck!
urjnasw xkfjjkn
The Sixth Sense
The Sixth Sense
Sixth Sense is a product of the efforts of Pranav Mistry. It's a new technology based on gesture- recognition which allows users to do everyday activities with just gestures. Right now, the project is in the developmental stage but being open source, anyone can download the code and play with it. Pranav Mistry has spoken at TED talks about this project.
Here are a couple videos where he and his adviser Pattie Maes demonstrate the project:
Video 2 --->
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Lightbulb jokes #1
Hey!!!
Here's a lightbulb joke. I wanna know y'all's creative answers to this question:
Q: How many hardware folks does it take to change a light bulb?
Please comment your answers!!!
Thanks,
Here's a lightbulb joke. I wanna know y'all's creative answers to this question:
Q: How many hardware folks does it take to change a light bulb?
Please comment your answers!!!
Thanks,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Search Engine Optimization! urjnasw xkfjjkn
Learn what search engine optimization is! Here you go!
Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of affecting
the visibility of a website or a web page in a search engine's
"natural" or un-paid ("organic") search results.[jargon] In
general, the earlier (or higher ranked on the search results page), and more
frequently a site appears in the search results list, the more visitors it will
receive from the search engine's users. SEO may target different kinds of
search, including image search, local search, video search, academic search,[1]
news search and industry-specific vertical search engines.
As an Internet marketing strategy, SEO considers how search
engines work, what people search for, the actual search terms or keywords typed
into search engines and which search engines are preferred by their targeted
audience. Optimizing a website may involve editing its content, HTML and
associated coding to both increase its relevance to specific keywords and to
remove barriers to the indexing activities of search engines. Promoting a site
to increase the number of backlinks, or inbound links, is another SEO tactic.
The plural of the abbreviation SEO can also refer to
"search engine optimizers," those who provide SEO services.
History
Webmasters and content providers began optimizing sites for
search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging
the early Web. Initially, all webmasters needed to do was to submit the address
of a page, or URL, to the various engines which would send a "spider"
to "crawl" that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return
information found on the page to be indexed. The process involves a search
engine spider downloading a page and storing it on the search engine's own
server, where a second program, known as an indexer, extracts various
information about the page, such as the words it contains and where these are
located, as well as any weight for specific words, and all links the page
contains, which are then placed into a scheduler for crawling at a later date.
Site owners started to recognize the value of having their
sites highly ranked and visible in search engine results, creating an
opportunity for both white hat and black hat SEO practitioners. According to
industry analyst Danny Sullivan, the phrase "search engine
optimization" probably came into use in 1997.[3] The first documented use
of the term Search Engine Optimization was John Audette and his company
Multimedia Marketing Group as documented by a web page from the MMG site from
August, 1997.[4]
Early versions of search algorithms relied on
webmaster-provided information such as the keyword meta tag, or index files in
engines like ALIWEB. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using
meta data to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because
the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an
inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Inaccurate, incomplete,
and inconsistent data in meta tags could and did cause pages to rank for
irrelevant searches.[5][dubious – discuss] Web content providers also
manipulated a number of attributes within the HTML source of a page in an
attempt to rank well in search engines.[6]
By relying so much on factors such as keyword density which
were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered
from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users,
search engines had to adapt to ensure their results pages showed the most
relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages stuffed with numerous
keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. Since the success and popularity of a
search engine is determined by its ability to produce the most relevant results
to any given search, allowing those results to be false would turn users to
find other search sources. Search engines responded by developing more complex
ranking algorithms, taking into account additional factors that were more
difficult for webmasters to manipulate. Graduate students at Stanford
University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developed "Backrub," a search
engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web
pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, PageRank, is a function of the
quantity and strength of inbound links.[7] PageRank estimates the likelihood
that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web, and
follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links
are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be
reached by the random surfer.
Page and Brin founded Google in 1998. Google attracted a loyal
following among the growing number of Internet users, who liked its simple
design.[8] Off-page factors (such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis) were
considered as well as on-page factors (such as keyword frequency, meta tags,
headings, links and site structure) to enable Google to avoid the kind of
manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for
their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to game, webmasters had
already developed link building tools and schemes to influence the Inktomi
search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming
PageRank. Many sites focused on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on
a massive scale. Some of these schemes, or link farms, involved the creation of
thousands of sites for the sole purpose of link spamming.[9]
By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of
undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link
manipulation. In June 2007, The New York Times' Saul Hansell stated Google
ranks sites using more than 200 different signals.[10] The leading search
engines, Google, Bing, and Yahoo, do not disclose the algorithms they use to
rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search
engine optimization, and have shared their personal opinions[11] Patents
related to search engines can provide information to better understand search
engines.[12]
In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each
user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results
for logged in users.[13] In 2008, Bruce Clay said that "ranking is
dead" because of personalized search. He opined that it would become
meaningless to discuss how a website ranked, because its rank would potentially
be different for each user and each search.[14]
In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that
transfer PageRank.[15] On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken
measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the nofollow
attribute on links. Matt Cutts, a well-known software engineer at Google,
announced that Google Bot would no longer treat nofollowed links in the same
way, in order to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank
sculpting.[16] As a result of this change the usage of nofollow leads to
evaporation of pagerank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed
alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated Javascript
and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally several solutions have been
suggested that include the usage of iframes, Flash and Javascript.[17]
In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web
search history of all its users in order to populate search results.[18]
Google Instant, real-time-search, was introduced in late
2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant.
Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a
website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social
media sites and blogs the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to
allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.[19]
In February 2011, Google announced the "Panda update,
which penalizes websites containing content duplicated from other websites and
sources. Historically websites have copied content from one another and
benefited in search engine rankings by engaging in this practice, however
Google implemented a new system which punishes sites whose content is not
unique.[20]
In April 2012, Google launched the Google Penguin update the
goal of which was to penalise websites that used manipulative techniques to
improve their rankings on the search engine.[21]
Relationship with search engines
By 1997, search engines recognized that webmasters were
making efforts to rank well in their search engines, and that some webmasters
were even manipulating their rankings in search results by stuffing pages with
excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as Altavista and Infoseek,
adjusted their algorithms in an effort to prevent webmasters from manipulating
rankings.[22]
In 2005, an annual conference, AIRWeb, Adversarial
Information Retrieval on the Web was created to bring together practitioners
and researchers concerned with search engine optimisation and related
topics.[23]
Companies that employ overly aggressive techniques can get
their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the Wall Street
Journal reported on a company, Traffic Power, which allegedly used high-risk
techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients.[24] Wired
magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for
writing about the ban.[25] Google's Matt Cutts later confirmed that Google did
in fact ban Traffic Power and some of its clients.[26]
Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO
industry, and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, chats, and
seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with
site optimization.[27][28] Google has a Sitemaps program to help webmasters
learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides
data on Google traffic to the website.[29] Bing Webmaster Tools provides a way
for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the
crawl rate, and track the web pages index status.
Methods
Getting indexed
The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing and Yahoo!,
use crawlers to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are
linked from other search engine indexed pages do not need to be submitted
because they are found automatically. Some search engines, notably Yahoo!,
operate a paid submission service that guarantee crawling for either a set fee
or cost per click.[30] Such programs usually guarantee inclusion in the
database, but do not guarantee specific ranking within the search results.[31]
Two major directories, the Yahoo Directory and the Open Directory Project both
require manual submission and human editorial review.[32] Google offers Google
Webmaster Tools, for which an XML Sitemap feed can be created and submitted for
free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not
discoverable by automatically following links.[33]
Search engine crawlers may look at a number of different
factors when crawling a site. Not every page is indexed by the search engines.
Distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in
whether or not pages get crawled.[34]
Preventing crawling
Main article: Robots Exclusion Standard
To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes,
webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories
through the standard robots.txt file in the root directory of the domain. Additionally,
a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine's database by using a
meta tag specific to robots. When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt
located in the root directory is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is
then parsed, and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be
crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may
on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish crawled. Pages typically
prevented from being crawled include login specific pages such as shopping
carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches.
In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of
internal search results because those pages are considered search spam.[35]
Increasing prominence
A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a
webpage within the search results. Cross linking between pages of the same
website to provide more links to most important pages may improve its
visibility.[36] Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword
phrase, so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to
increase traffic.[36] Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling
back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords
to a web page's meta data, including the title tag and meta description, will
tend to improve the relevancy of a site's search listings, thus increasing
traffic. URL normalization of web pages accessible via multiple urls, using the
canonical link element[37] or via 301 redirects can help make sure links to
different versions of the url all count towards the page's link popularity
score.
White hat versus black hat techniques
SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories:
techniques that search engines recommend as part of good design, and those
techniques of which search engines do not approve. The search engines attempt
to minimize the effect of the latter, among them spamdexing. Industry
commentators have classified these methods, and the practitioners who employ
them, as either white hat SEO, or black hat SEO.[38] White hats tend to produce
results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites
may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search
engines discover what they are doing.[39]
An SEO technique is considered white hat if it conforms to
the search engines' guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine
guidelines[27][28][40] are not written as a series of rules or commandments,
this is an important distinction to note. White hat SEO is not just about
following guidelines, but is about ensuring that the content a search engine
indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat
advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search
engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the spiders, rather
than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. White hat SEO
is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility,[41]
although the two are not identical.
Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are
disapproved of by the search engines, or involve deception. One black hat
technique uses text that is hidden, either as text colored similar to the
background, in an invisible div, or positioned off screen. Another method gives
a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human
visitor or a search engine, a technique known as cloaking.
Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black
hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings
from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either
automatically by the search engines' algorithms, or by a manual site review.
One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both BMW Germany and Ricoh
Germany for use of deceptive practices.[42] Both companies, however, quickly
apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google's list.[43]
As a marketing strategy
SEO is not an appropriate strategy for every website, and
other Internet marketing strategies can be more effective, depending on the
site operator's goals.[44] A successful Internet marketing campaign may also
depend upon building high quality web pages to engage and persuade, setting up
analytics programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a
site's conversion rate.[45]
SEO may generate an adequate return on investment. However,
search engines are not paid for organic search traffic, their algorithms
change, and there are no guarantees of continued referrals. Due to this lack of
guarantees and certainty, a business that relies heavily on search engine
traffic can suffer major losses if the search engines stop sending
visitors.[46] Search engines can change their algorithms, impacting a website's
placement, possibly resulting in a serious loss of traffic. According to
Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, in 2010, Google made over 500 algorithm changes – almost
1.5 per day.[47] It is considered wise business practice for website operators
to liberate themselves from dependence on search engine traffic.[48]
International markets
Optimization techniques are highly tuned to the dominant
search engines in the target market. The search engines' market shares vary
from market to market, as does competition. In 2003, Danny Sullivan stated that
Google represented about 75% of all searches.[49] In markets outside the United
States, Google's share is often larger, and Google remains the dominant search
engine worldwide as of 2007.[50] As of 2006, Google had an 85–90% market share
in Germany.[51] While there were hundreds of SEO firms in the US at that time,
there were only about five in Germany.[51] As of June 2008, the marketshare of
Google in the UK was close to 90% according to Hitwise.[52] That market share
is achieved in a number of countries.
As of 2009, there are only a few large markets where Google
is not the leading search engine. In most cases, when Google is not leading in
a given market, it is lagging behind a local player. The most notable markets
where this is the case are China, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the Czech
Republic where respectively Baidu, Yahoo! Japan, Naver, Yandex and Seznam are
market leaders.
Successful search optimization for international markets may
require professional translation of web pages, registration of a domain name
with a top level domain in the target market, and web hosting that provides a
local IP address. Otherwise, the fundamental elements of search optimization
are essentially the same, regardless of language.[51]
Legal precedents
On October 17, 2002, SearchKing filed suit in the United
States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma, against the search engine
Google. SearchKing's claim was that Google's tactics to prevent spamdexing
constituted a tortious interference with contractual relations. On May 27,
2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint because
SearchKing "failed to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted."[53][54]
In March 2006, KinderStart filed a lawsuit against Google
over search engine rankings. Kinderstart's website was removed from Google's
index prior to the lawsuit and the amount of traffic to the site dropped by
70%. On March 16, 2007 the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California (San Jose Division) dismissed KinderStart's complaint
without leave to amend, and partially granted Google's motion for Rule 11
sanctions against KinderStart's attorney, requiring him to pay part of Google's
legal expenses.
Sources:
Hope you enjoyed!
Thanks,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Answer to Yahoo! question
Hey!
Here's the solution:
Momentum Conservation:
Since the boat is at rest initially, the total momentum is zero. So it has to be zero after the mass is thrown.
Initial Momentum = 0
Final Momentum = (77 + 136) * v + (15 * 4.4) where v is the final velocity of the boat
=> (77 + 136) * v + (15 * 4.4) = 0
=> 213 * v + 66 = 0
=> v = -66 / 213 = -0.3098591549295775
The boat moves in the opposite direction to where the package was thrown with a velocity of -0.3098591549295775.
Good luck!
Here's the solution:
Momentum Conservation:
Since the boat is at rest initially, the total momentum is zero. So it has to be zero after the mass is thrown.
Initial Momentum = 0
Final Momentum = (77 + 136) * v + (15 * 4.4) where v is the final velocity of the boat
=> (77 + 136) * v + (15 * 4.4) = 0
=> 213 * v + 66 = 0
=> v = -66 / 213 = -0.3098591549295775
The boat moves in the opposite direction to where the package was thrown with a velocity of -0.3098591549295775.
Good luck!
- urjnasw xkfjjkn
Friday, February 15, 2013
Answer to Yahoo! question
Hey there!
Here's the answer to your question:
Here's the answer to your question:
4 + 5 ( 12 x 7) - 453
= 4 + [5 * (12 * 7)] - 453
= 4 + [5 * 84] - 453
= 4 + 420 - 453
= 424 - 453
= -29
Multiplication and division precede addition and subtraction. Hence, the grouping.
Hope it helps.
Have a nice and blessed day!
Good luck,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
= 4 + [5 * 84] - 453
= 4 + 420 - 453
= 424 - 453
= -29
Multiplication and division precede addition and subtraction. Hence, the grouping.
Hope it helps.
Have a nice and blessed day!
Good luck,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Answer to Yahoo! question
Hey!
Here's the answer:
Area = PI * (radius ^ 2) = 169 * PI (given).
Therefore, radius ^ 2 = 169
Therefore, taking the square root, radius = 13
Circumference = 2 * PI * radius = 2 * PI * 13 = 26 * PI = 81.6814089933
Hope it helps. Let me know if you have any more questions!
Have a great and blessed day!
Good luck,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Here's the answer:
Area = PI * (radius ^ 2) = 169 * PI (given).
Therefore, radius ^ 2 = 169
Therefore, taking the square root, radius = 13
Circumference = 2 * PI * radius = 2 * PI * 13 = 26 * PI = 81.6814089933
Hope it helps. Let me know if you have any more questions!
Have a great and blessed day!
Good luck,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Answer to Yahoo! question
Hey!
Here's the answer:
Your question is [3 ^ (1/4)] * [3 ^ (1/3)] = 3 ^ [(1/4) + (1/3)] = 3 ^ (7/12) = 1.89810717967
Hope it helps! Let me know if you have any other questions!
Have a great and blessed day!
Good luck,
Here's the answer:
Your question is [3 ^ (1/4)] * [3 ^ (1/3)] = 3 ^ [(1/4) + (1/3)] = 3 ^ (7/12) = 1.89810717967
Hope it helps! Let me know if you have any other questions!
Have a great and blessed day!
Good luck,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Answer to Yahoo! question
Hey!
So here's the answer to your Yahoo! question:
Let's call the length of the garden "L" and width of the garden is "H". It's given that L = W + 8 and
(L + 2) ( W+ 2) = A + 60 where A = area of original garden = L * W
=> L * W + 2 * L + 2 *W + 4 = L * W + 60
=> (W + 8) * W + 2 * (W + 8) + 2 * W + 4 = (W + 8) * W + 60
=> W^2 + 8 * W + 2 * W + 16 + 2 * W + 4 = W ^ 2 + 8 * W + 60
=> 12 * W + 20 = 8 * W + 60 (we canceled out or subtracted W ^2 from both sides)
=> 4 * W = 40
=> W = 40 / 4
=> W = 10
=> L = W + 8 = 10 + 8 = 18
Therefore, the length of the garden is 18 feet and the width of the garden is 10 feet.
Hope it helps!
Let me know if you have any other questions!
Have a great and blessed day!
Good luck,
So here's the answer to your Yahoo! question:
Let's call the length of the garden "L" and width of the garden is "H". It's given that L = W + 8 and
(L + 2) ( W+ 2) = A + 60 where A = area of original garden = L * W
=> L * W + 2 * L + 2 *W + 4 = L * W + 60
=> (W + 8) * W + 2 * (W + 8) + 2 * W + 4 = (W + 8) * W + 60
=> W^2 + 8 * W + 2 * W + 16 + 2 * W + 4 = W ^ 2 + 8 * W + 60
=> 12 * W + 20 = 8 * W + 60 (we canceled out or subtracted W ^2 from both sides)
=> 4 * W = 40
=> W = 40 / 4
=> W = 10
=> L = W + 8 = 10 + 8 = 18
Therefore, the length of the garden is 18 feet and the width of the garden is 10 feet.
Hope it helps!
Let me know if you have any other questions!
Have a great and blessed day!
Good luck,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Answer to Yahoo! question
Hi!
So I read your question on Yahoo! and here's my answer to your question:
Question 1: "Tim has twice the number of books as Lily. Together they have 51 books. How many does Tim have? "
Solution: Let's say Tim has "T" books and Lily has "L" books.
Now, it's given that T = 2 * L and T + L = 51
So, using the first equation in the second one, we get (2 * L) + L = 51 => 3 * L = 51 => L = 51 / 3 => L = 17. Therefore, Lily has 17 books and Tim has twice that number = 2 * 17 = 34 books.
Question 2: "Joe has sent out 8 less valentine cards than Charles. Together they sent out 52 cards. How many did each send? "
Solution: Let's say Joe sent out "J" cards and Charles sent out "C" cards.
It's given that J = C - 8 and J + C = 52.
So, using the first equation in the second one, we get (C - 8) + C = 52 => 2 * C - 8 = 52
=> 2 * C = 52 + 8 => 2 * C = 60 => C = 60 / 2 => C = 30. Therefore, Charles sent out 30 cards and Joe sent out 8 less than Charles = 30 - 8 = 22 cards.
Let me know if you need any more help!
Good Luck,
So I read your question on Yahoo! and here's my answer to your question:
Question 1: "Tim has twice the number of books as Lily. Together they have 51 books. How many does Tim have? "
Solution: Let's say Tim has "T" books and Lily has "L" books.
Now, it's given that T = 2 * L and T + L = 51
So, using the first equation in the second one, we get (2 * L) + L = 51 => 3 * L = 51 => L = 51 / 3 => L = 17. Therefore, Lily has 17 books and Tim has twice that number = 2 * 17 = 34 books.
Question 2: "Joe has sent out 8 less valentine cards than Charles. Together they sent out 52 cards. How many did each send? "
Solution: Let's say Joe sent out "J" cards and Charles sent out "C" cards.
It's given that J = C - 8 and J + C = 52.
So, using the first equation in the second one, we get (C - 8) + C = 52 => 2 * C - 8 = 52
=> 2 * C = 52 + 8 => 2 * C = 60 => C = 60 / 2 => C = 30. Therefore, Charles sent out 30 cards and Joe sent out 8 less than Charles = 30 - 8 = 22 cards.
Let me know if you need any more help!
Good Luck,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
The Carnival Triumph finallu makes it to the port!!!
Hey y'all!!!
The Carnival Triumph was stuck in the ocean for about 5 days and it had about 4000 passengers on board. It finally made it to the port yesterday (Thursday, February 14, 2013). The passengers went through a lot of troubles. Here's a link to the story:
Link to the news article
Here's NBC's article about it:NBC's article
Alright peeps, gotta go to bed now!
Take care, good night and God bless!
- urjnasw xkfjjkn
The Carnival Triumph was stuck in the ocean for about 5 days and it had about 4000 passengers on board. It finally made it to the port yesterday (Thursday, February 14, 2013). The passengers went through a lot of troubles. Here's a link to the story:
Link to the news article
Here's NBC's article about it:NBC's article
Alright peeps, gotta go to bed now!
Take care, good night and God bless!
- urjnasw xkfjjkn
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Index me, urjnasw xkfjjkn!!!
Oh hey Google!
You're so cool! Thanks for being my friend! I need a favor though! Whenever I search for urjnasw xkfjjkn, I want you to show my blog in the search results!
Thanks in advance,
urjnasw xkfjjkn!!!
You're so cool! Thanks for being my friend! I need a favor though! Whenever I search for urjnasw xkfjjkn, I want you to show my blog in the search results!
Thanks in advance,
urjnasw xkfjjkn!!!
Found a friend, urjnasw xkfjjkn!
Oh hey again!!!
So while talking to my friend on the phone, I was visiting random blogs (told ya I'm crazy) and guess what I found! A friend of mine!!! He has a blog on this same website! It's so good to know that I am not alone!
As I said, we all have the same names. So his name is urjnasw xkfjjkn too! He talks about magical adventures in College Station and Jupiter. Exciting, right? He was born in 2013. Apparently, he is in need of baby food so if y'all can help him out, that'd be great!
I can't post his blog link here because if I do and my home planet peeps find out about it, I will be in big trouble. But I will keep posting! And hey, if you wanna convey a message to him, LET ME KNOW IN THE COMMENTS!!!
Peace out friends,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Friend 1
Friend 2
Friend 3
Friend 4
Friend 5
Friend 6
So while talking to my friend on the phone, I was visiting random blogs (told ya I'm crazy) and guess what I found! A friend of mine!!! He has a blog on this same website! It's so good to know that I am not alone!
As I said, we all have the same names. So his name is urjnasw xkfjjkn too! He talks about magical adventures in College Station and Jupiter. Exciting, right? He was born in 2013. Apparently, he is in need of baby food so if y'all can help him out, that'd be great!
I can't post his blog link here because if I do and my home planet peeps find out about it, I will be in big trouble. But I will keep posting! And hey, if you wanna convey a message to him, LET ME KNOW IN THE COMMENTS!!!
Peace out friends,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Friend 1
Friend 2
Friend 3
Friend 4
Friend 5
Friend 6
Labels:
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Location:
College Station, TX, USA
Howdy!
Howdy y'all!
So I am urjnasw xkfjjkn. Pretty weird name, right? Well, it reflects what kind of a person I am... I am weird!!! :P :P :P Hahaha. I always make jokes. This urjnasw xkfjjkn contest is kinda fun.
A little bit about myself: I am from a planet called Urjnasw Xkfjjkn. I was named after the planet. It's a really funny planet. Everyone has the same name! So my country's name is urjnasw xkfjjkn. My pet's name is urjnasw xkfjjkn. Everyone has the same name, urjnasw xkfjjkn. LOL. It gets pretty confusing when someone says, "urjnasw xkfjjkn" because the whole population has the same name! ha! I have a friend Raj Shah on Earth. He is pretty funny too. Kinda like me. Actually, exactly like me.
Well, I gotta go now because my friend urjnasw xkfjjkn is calling me from my planet urjnasw xkfjjkn. It's an intergalactic call. But hey y'all, stay tuned for more posts!!!
Here's a funny video:
Peace out homies,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
So I am urjnasw xkfjjkn. Pretty weird name, right? Well, it reflects what kind of a person I am... I am weird!!! :P :P :P Hahaha. I always make jokes. This urjnasw xkfjjkn contest is kinda fun.
A little bit about myself: I am from a planet called Urjnasw Xkfjjkn. I was named after the planet. It's a really funny planet. Everyone has the same name! So my country's name is urjnasw xkfjjkn. My pet's name is urjnasw xkfjjkn. Everyone has the same name, urjnasw xkfjjkn. LOL. It gets pretty confusing when someone says, "urjnasw xkfjjkn" because the whole population has the same name! ha! I have a friend Raj Shah on Earth. He is pretty funny too. Kinda like me. Actually, exactly like me.
Well, I gotta go now because my friend urjnasw xkfjjkn is calling me from my planet urjnasw xkfjjkn. It's an intergalactic call. But hey y'all, stay tuned for more posts!!!
Here's a funny video:
Peace out homies,
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Labels:
urjnasw xkfjjkn
Location:
College Station, TX, USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)